Unanimous Jury Verdicts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

unscathed Jury Verdicts - Essay ExampleIn common law jurisdictions, criminal finding of facts must be unanimous in order to acquit or convict according to the North Hesperian University journal (1972). The panel must arrive at an undivided opinion. Originally, the Supreme Court held unanimity as an essential feature film of trial by the jury, however, in recent years, on that point is growing discretion in the states. In Apodaca v Oregon (1972),and Johnson v Louisiana (1972),convictions were reached on a less than unanimous vote, ten to two and clubhouse to three respectively. In Ballew v Georgia (1978), Justice Powell reiterates that the fourteenth amendment did not impose the comparable requirements for juries on states that the sixth amendment did on the federal government. A recent article examining the effect of eliminating this unanimity rule concludes that, there may only be a small range of evidence in which its effects consistently appear, that is, when the prosecuti on/plaintiffs case is not particularly weak or strong (North Western University, 1972). This discussion therefore makes a strong argument on the circumstances where the jurys verdict must be unanimous in the united states and in common law traditions. On the same vein concludes that, not all state verdicts have to be unanimous, with the two cases manifesting the jury.